KRITIS

AI for assessment

From answersto understanding.

AI-powered assessment intelligence
for modern educational institutions.

The process

Turning complex
answers into
clear insights.

Evaluate, explain, and verify student answers with clarity and consistency.

A hand writing an answer on paper

Different
subjects
same
clarity

[K]

01 — UnderstandBring questions, answers, and their academic context into one clear view.

ASSESSMENT INTELLIGENCEBuilt for education

Built for real education

Assessment
intelligence
that scales.

From the first response to the bigger picture.
A connected approach to academic assessment.

INSTITUTIONAL INTELLIGENCEInside the technology

Designed for education

Across disciplines
and institutions.

From university exams to professional certifications, assessment starts with your subject and criteria.

UniversitiesBring structured review to essay-based exams, coursework, and large academic departments.Explore with us
Also designed for examination providers

INSIDE THE INTELLIGENCE

[ A CONNECTED APPROACH ]

Every answer.
Every criterion.
A clearer connection.

Assessment is a chain of decisions. KRITIS is being developed to make that chain more visible, from the first question to the final review.

ASSESSMENT / CONNECTION MAPEXPLORE
02

Evidence matching

Connect passages in an answer to the relevant assessment criteria, so the basis for a decision stays visible.

Drag to rotate · Select a node to explore

DESIGNED AROUND EDUCATORS

Better perspective.
Human judgement.

Intelligence should support the people responsible for learning. These principles guide the KRITIS assessment workflow.

01CONSISTENCY

A shared standard.

Keep the rubric visible across every answer. Make differences in interpretation easier to identify and discuss.

02TRANSPARENCY

Reasoning you can review.

Connect decisions to answer evidence, with explanations that invite scrutiny and correction.

03FLEXIBILITY

Your criteria. Your context.

Shape assessment around the subject, the question, and your institution’s marking approach.

04TIME & SCALE

More space for teaching.

A workflow designed to reduce repetitive review, so educators can focus on the decisions that need their expertise.

05HUMAN OVERSIGHT

People stay in the loop.

Educators review findings, resolve exceptions, and retain responsibility for final assessment decisions.

06DATA HANDLING

Data deserves a conversation.

Agree on access, retention, and institutional requirements before an evaluation uses real student information.

RESEARCH & VALIDATION

Trust is built.
Not assumed.

Useful assessment intelligence needs more than a compelling demonstration. It needs clear methods, real academic scrutiny, and honest limits.

VALIDATION FRAMEWORK / PROPOSED
01How should quality be evaluated?

Compare assessments against explicit rubrics and independently reviewed reference answers. Examine disagreements by criterion, subject, and answer type, including where the system should defer to an educator.

Proposed methodology · Results are not yet published here.
02Where do academic experts fit?

Subject experts should define the rubric, inspect evidence, review edge cases, and retain the final decision. The goal is a reviewable workflow that supports professional judgement.

Design principle · No expert endorsements are claimed.
03What has been validated?

No independently verified performance metrics, published studies, or institutional partnerships are presented on this website. Published evaluation evidence will be needed to establish model performance.

Research status · Evidence will be published when available.
04What would an institutional pilot involve?

A proposed pilot would begin with agreed evaluation goals, authorized sample material, human review, and institution-specific data handling requirements. Scope and success criteria should be settled before student data is used.

Record your interest

THE KRITIS PERSPECTIVE

An answer is more
than a mark.

It is a window into how someone thinks. Assessment should make that understanding clearer, for educators and learners alike.

KRITIS explores how computational intelligence can support that work: connecting answers, criteria, and explanations while keeping academic judgement with people.

START WITH A CONVERSATION

A clearer view
of what’s
possible.

Tell us about your institution and the assessment challenges you want to explore.

Secure request collectionRequests are stored on the KRITIS server for the team to review. No automatic confirmation email is sent.

Request a demo

* REQUIRED

Submitting stores these details on the KRITIS server so the team can respond. Please do not include student or other sensitive information.